It's almost impossible for me to resolve the cognitive dissonance of seeing an educated, by all means literate person completely devalue privacy to the point th

It's almost impossible for me to resolve the cognitive dissonance of seeing an educated, by all means literate person completely devalue privacy to the point that it ceases to exist. To say with a straight face, after the events of the 20th century (and the horrors of Russian and German domestic intelligence services, past abuses committed by the FBI, the current human rights clusterfuck in places like China, Iran, and Syria), that all communication should moderated and monitored by the government? Can anyone support that idea in good faith? I agree with you that it's an almost unbelievable level of stupidity and one that betrays an ulterior motive. But normally I'd say something like this played into some industry or private-interest wish, but what bank or corporation (much less any commercial tech venture) is pushing for this? What group could this possibly serve in society other than the most high-ranking (and power-hungry) officials in the intelligence establishment?