3 ms·

TheFacebook: Stunning Numbers (May 2005)

39 points by jasonlbaptiste 17y ago

ivankirigin 17y ago
The interesting thing about exponential growth is that the numbers are always stunning. Ohh, and that is why the singularity doesn't exist.
- unalone 17y ago
  Ohh, and that is why the singularity doesn't exist. Hm? How does that follow from your first statement?
  - ivankirigin 17y ago
    You are always in the knee of an exp curve. There is no point in the future where the growth breaks down your models. That is a persistent state of the world right now.
tdm911 17y ago
Oh yeah, and they are already making gazillions of dollars and are profitable. Didn't Facebook only achieve profitability a month or so ago? Or have I missed something?
- hvs 17y ago
  They just went cash flow positive about a month ago: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/15/facebook-crosses-300-million-users-oh-yeah-and-their-cash-flow-just-went-positive/ http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/15/facebook-crosses-300-mi...
- nikolayv 17y ago
  Can they not be profitable for a bit and then invest a bunch until they become profitable again?
  - tdm911 17y ago
    Absolutely, I was under the impression that they had for the first time. Also, were they really making enough money in 2005 for it to be described as 'gazillions'?
- sachinag 17y ago
  This was pre-Photos app, which is what took off like a rocket and blew out their hosting and bandwidth costs. They were profitable before Photos.
  - tibbon 17y ago
    Really? Did photos set them under? Almost all FB photos are low resolution compared with the 10MP ones I throw on Flickr and get much less traffic in my estimate. I believe you, but its amazing that bandwidth costs for photos could set them under for such a long time.
    - unalone 17y ago
      Facebook has more users than Flickr; its users upload more photos than Flickr's. http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/02/23/facebook-increases-lead-as-top-photo-sharing-site/ http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/02/23/facebook-increases-... They get more than twice the photo traffic Flickr does. It's also interesting, looking at that second graph and realizing that Facebook hasn't peaked yet. Did you know that according to Compete Facebook is visited nearly as much as Yahoo and Google? Or that it's got 250% the traffic of MySpace?

The interesting thing about exponential growth is that the numbers are always stunning. Ohh, and that is why the singularity doesn't exist.

unalone 17y ago
Ohh, and that is why the singularity doesn't exist. Hm? How does that follow from your first statement?
- ivankirigin 17y ago
  You are always in the knee of an exp curve. There is no point in the future where the growth breaks down your models. That is a persistent state of the world right now.

tdm911 17y ago

Oh yeah, and they are already making gazillions of dollars and are profitable. Didn't Facebook only achieve profitability a month or so ago? Or have I missed something?

hvs 17y ago
They just went cash flow positive about a month ago: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/15/facebook-crosses-300-million-users-oh-yeah-and-their-cash-flow-just-went-positive/ http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/15/facebook-crosses-300-mi...
nikolayv 17y ago
Can they not be profitable for a bit and then invest a bunch until they become profitable again?
- tdm911 17y ago
  Absolutely, I was under the impression that they had for the first time. Also, were they really making enough money in 2005 for it to be described as 'gazillions'?
sachinag 17y ago
This was pre-Photos app, which is what took off like a rocket and blew out their hosting and bandwidth costs. They were profitable before Photos.
- tibbon 17y ago
  Really? Did photos set them under? Almost all FB photos are low resolution compared with the 10MP ones I throw on Flickr and get much less traffic in my estimate. I believe you, but its amazing that bandwidth costs for photos could set them under for such a long time.
  - unalone 17y ago
    Facebook has more users than Flickr; its users upload more photos than Flickr's. http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/02/23/facebook-increases-lead-as-top-photo-sharing-site/ http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/02/23/facebook-increases-... They get more than twice the photo traffic Flickr does. It's also interesting, looking at that second graph and realizing that Facebook hasn't peaked yet. Did you know that according to Compete Facebook is visited nearly as much as Yahoo and Google? Or that it's got 250% the traffic of MySpace?