3 ms·

Pricing still looks pretty far out there. Their CPU has a passmark score of 16k[1] and they ask $1300 USD/mo for it. Hetzner will rent you one with passmark 1

by moe 12y ago

Pricing still looks pretty far out there. Their CPU has a passmark score of 16k[1] and they ask $1300 USD/mo for it. Hetzner will rent you one with passmark 10k[2] for $60/mo... [1] http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Xeon+E5-2680+v2+%40+2.80GHz http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Xeon+E5-2680+v... [2] http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-4770+%40+3.40GHz&id=1907 http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-4770+%...

ianlevesque 12y ago
AWS is expensive for some definitions of expensive, water is wet. That is a crazy difference though if you can take advantage of it.
- micro-ram 12y ago
  I would love to leave my colo for AWS but the numbers just don't work.
ddorian43 12y ago
you forgot the bandwidth price
meltedice 12y ago
That assumes that there's only one chip in the server (unlikely with 36 vcpus listed for C4), that you're happy with using a desktop chip with no ECC for Hetzner, and your pricing doesn't consider reserved instance pricing for C4 which costs much less than $1300.
- latch 12y ago
  Though notably more than the quoted $50, for €69, you get a server chip and ECC.
- moe 12y ago
  The ECC version costs $81/mo at Hetzner. 3 years reserved c4.8xlarge costs $501/mo at EC2. If you can commit for 3 years, why would you pay a 6x markup for "elasticity"? (11x if you commit for only 1 year...)
  - caw 12y ago
    AWS reserved instances are buying hours. If you can commit to running a particular instance type for ~720 hours every month for a year or 3, then it makes sense to go RI. You don't have to use for one machine running 24x7, you can burst with loads - 2 machines 12x7, etc etc.
  - zimfin44 12y ago
    Does that server also provide 36 cores, 60GB of RAM, 10Gbps network and the fastest Intel CPU available anywhere? You're comparing a single low-end chip vs a server with multiple cutting edge chips. Everyone knows you pay more for the fastest chips. If budget is the only criterion then there are many less expensive instances.

by moe 12y ago

ianlevesque 12y ago

AWS is expensive for some definitions of expensive, water is wet. That is a crazy difference though if you can take advantage of it.

micro-ram 12y ago
I would love to leave my colo for AWS but the numbers just don't work.

ddorian43 12y ago

you forgot the bandwidth price

meltedice 12y ago

That assumes that there's only one chip in the server (unlikely with 36 vcpus listed for C4), that you're happy with using a desktop chip with no ECC for Hetzner, and your pricing doesn't consider reserved instance pricing for C4 which costs much less than $1300.

latch 12y ago
Though notably more than the quoted $50, for €69, you get a server chip and ECC.
moe 12y ago
The ECC version costs $81/mo at Hetzner. 3 years reserved c4.8xlarge costs $501/mo at EC2. If you can commit for 3 years, why would you pay a 6x markup for "elasticity"? (11x if you commit for only 1 year...)
- caw 12y ago
  AWS reserved instances are buying hours. If you can commit to running a particular instance type for ~720 hours every month for a year or 3, then it makes sense to go RI. You don't have to use for one machine running 24x7, you can burst with loads - 2 machines 12x7, etc etc.
- zimfin44 12y ago
  Does that server also provide 36 cores, 60GB of RAM, 10Gbps network and the fastest Intel CPU available anywhere? You're comparing a single low-end chip vs a server with multiple cutting edge chips. Everyone knows you pay more for the fastest chips. If budget is the only criterion then there are many less expensive instances.