4 ms·
This is worthless unless they correct for age. Which they most likely don't, since age is not even mentioned in the post.
by Camillo 12y ago
This is worthless unless they correct for age. Which they most likely don't, since age is not even mentioned in the post.
- stygiansonic 12y agoIndeed, the time period in which someone was born seems to have a significant effect on the likelihood of certain names. Here's one study that documents that effect in the US: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-to-tell-someones-age-when-all-you-know-is-her-name/ http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-to-tell-someones-age...
- pawelk 12y agoWolfram Alpha parses queries like "how old is [name]" and renders the age distribution, e.g. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+old+is+jane http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+old+is+jane
- crpatino 12y agoNo study, but first hand experience. My father is a Pediatrician, and he has always commented on the strong correlations between relatively common names in his current crop of patients and the names of 5-year-ago-popular TV shows' protagonists. The first time I was able to make the connection, it was Brandon/Brenda/Dylan.
- emodendroket 12y ago"Worthless" in what sense? If we want to know something in particular, maybe, but perhaps knowing that people who have a certain job tend to be older is of interest? Some jobs seem to have entirely female names in the chart; is the fact that women are apparently significantly overrepresented in those fields also "worthless?"