3 ms·
With or without Unicode's own meddling, characters may still look the same. Think of non-Latin alphabets that have letters defined in an identical fashion to th
by restalis 12y ago
With or without Unicode's own meddling, characters may still look the same. Think of non-Latin alphabets that have letters defined in an identical fashion to those in Latin alphabet. Heck, even without other alphabets, the Latin letter O and the digit 0 are valid characters for filenames in any system I know of, and although looking the same they are yet different. (Having a bar, a point, or some other distinctive mark inside 0 is just a hack, the common description for the aspect of this digit makes no distinction from letter O.) This problem is not new, definitely not brought up by this Unicode thing.
- MrBuddyCasino 12y agoTrue, we have seen this issue with fraudulent domain names, where they can pose a security issue. To me it seems normalisation at least reduces the attack surface, while not solving the issue completely. I am not qualified to judge whether or not the complexity increase is worth it. But what are the downsides - what is so bad about NFC?