3 ms·
I might be misunderstanding you, but I don't think any extreme is a good thing simply because being limited to an extreme means having less choice, and that is
by placebo 12y ago
I might be misunderstanding you, but I don't think any extreme is a good thing simply because being limited to an extreme means having less choice, and that is a bad thing. There are advantages to centralism, there are advantages to distributed systems and there are advantages to doing the processing locally. The best state of affairs is having all these options available to you when deciding how to architect the best system for your requirements. If a mainframe type solution is the best, do that. If running it on your PC can solve the problem, then do that. If you need a combination then do that. Personally, I think that returning to the "mainframe does it all" concept is a huge step back in terms of freedom, and therefore in terms of potential.
- walterbell 12y agoThe papers for CMU's cloudlets project cover some topological assets of code that runs centrally or is slaved to central logic, http://elijah.cs.cmu.edu http://elijah.cs.cmu.edu The next step is formalizing interactions for code that runs on the same node (central or edge), but originates from competitive businesses.
- gaius 12y agoIn uptime, security and manageability, nothing can touch the mainframe. If you build a mainframe out of thousands of CPUs and call it a "cloud" that's fine :-)