3 ms·
>but I don't see why it shouldn't be this way, to be honest. Because essential public services shouldn't be reliant on the whim of a company. This is why we h
by imron 12y ago
>but I don't see why it shouldn't be this way, to be honest.
Because essential public services shouldn't be reliant on the whim of a company.
This is why we have taxes. If the city doesn't have enough money to be funding such services, it should perhaps look in to why Google pays so little tax.
- refurb 12y agoBecause essential public services shouldn't be reliant on the whim of a company. I'm confused. I'm assuming that the UK uses tax money to hire private companies to provide the transit services. The public services aren't at the whim of a company, they are just provided by a company.
- imron 12y agoExactly, and companies are compelled by law to pay the taxes, as compared to companies providing these services out of good corporate citizenship.