3 ms·

this is not consistently supported across browsers. plus no rocket-like rotation :-)

• Sir_Cmpwn 12y ago
  IE 6+, webkit 1.0+, firefox 1.5+. It's been supported for a loooooong time.
  • matthewmueller 12y ago
    We would love to have used cursor: url(...); but in our testing you run into constraints (like sizing and rotation) that don't let you do the stuff we're doing here.
    • drdeca 12y ago
      In my experience with cursor:url(); in Chrome at least, fairly large image sizes are allowed, and work fine. I haven't tried on other browsers. I don't understand why one would want the image to rotate? Maybe I don't understand what you mean by rotation.
• deleted 12y ago
  [deleted]