3 ms·
Firstly, don't do this. Secondly, if you insist on doing it, don't pay 5 bucks for it. It's just cursor: url(...); https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/We
by Sir_Cmpwn 12y ago
Firstly, don't do this.
Secondly, if you insist on doing it, don't pay 5 bucks for it. It's just cursor: url(...);
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/cursor https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/cursor
- matthewmueller 12y agothis is not consistently supported across browsers. plus no rocket-like rotation :-)
- Sir_Cmpwn 12y agoIE 6+, webkit 1.0+, firefox 1.5+. It's been supported for a loooooong time.
- matthewmueller 12y agoWe would love to have used cursor: url(...); but in our testing you run into constraints (like sizing and rotation) that don't let you do the stuff we're doing here.
- drdeca 12y agoIn my experience with cursor:url(); in Chrome at least, fairly large image sizes are allowed, and work fine. I haven't tried on other browsers. I don't understand why one would want the image to rotate? Maybe I don't understand what you mean by rotation.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]