4 ms·
May I just say that article could have been written in 2 pages and still made its point (probably more effectively). On the topic, I don’t believe in transpare
by TomOfTTB 17y ago
May I just say that article could have been written in 2 pages and still made its point (probably more effectively).
On the topic, I don’t believe in transparency for people who actually “do things” (as opposed to say reporters whose job is essentially advisory). Because I believe in judging results. I would no sooner micromanage my representatives than I would my employees. I know what I want from my elected officials and I expect them to deliver it or convince me to want something different from them. If they try to convince me to want something different I expect them to justify it to me and I’ll decide whether their justifications are sufficient.
So while I’d prefer they not take money to have an opinion I don’t really care either way because the decision to support what they believe in is with me. If they start taking non-sense opinions, either because of pay offs or simply because they’ve lost their minds, that’s when it becomes my responsibility to vote them out.
- cookingrobot 17y agoWhat if your employee was secretly being paid by a competitor to sabotage your project. As you say, you could just judge the results of his work, but it can take a lot of time to judge the outcome of complex projects, and to separate deliberate failure from normal risky-project / try again next time failure. This is what's happening when oil companies pay-off people in power to sabotage environmental policy. It's really much more efficient if we can weed out the saboteurs from our teams.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- dustingetz 17y agoor, reduce project complexity, to make it easy to judge the outcome of his work. complexity is evil.