2 ms·
That would be a really tough argument to make. It goes to great lengths to give control over memory layout and control and lacks a LOT of the features of Haske
by nightski 12y ago
That would be a really tough argument to make. It goes to great lengths to give control over memory layout and control and lacks a LOT of the features of Haskell's type system. It's a lot more like a prettier D than Haskell. Not only that with every iteration it has been moving farther away from the FP paradigm.
- naasking 12y agoI think you mean GHC's type system, since Rust is arguably quite close to Haskell 98 in spirit, ie. algebraic types, lambdas, pattern matching, traits = single parameter type classes.