3 ms·
Indirect normativity is a losing strategy because you don't know what the resultant ethical system will be. https://ordinaryideas.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/indir
by yanazendo 12y ago
Indirect normativity is a losing strategy because you don't know what the resultant ethical system will be. https://ordinaryideas.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/indirect-normativity-write-up/ https://ordinaryideas.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/indirect-norm...
Humanity has already solved ethics, so there's no reason for us to give up and ask AI to define ethics for us.
- Houshalter 12y ago>Indirect normativity is a losing strategy because you don't know what the resultant ethical system will be. That's the point... >Humanity has already solved ethics Where on earth do you get this idea?
- yanazendo 12y agoAwareness of ethical systems. What makes you think ethics isn't solved? Here's a relevant essay http://medium.com/@yanazendo/how-to-be-lazy-and-successful-at-the-same-time-1c283c6880b3 http://medium.com/@yanazendo/how-to-be-lazy-and-successful-a...
- Houshalter 12y agoThat's not even close to a formalization of human morality. Such a thing probably isn't even possible. See this: http://lesswrong.com/lw/ld/the_hidden_complexity_of_wishes/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/ld/the_hidden_complexity_of_wishes/