4 ms·
Another solution I'd recommend is SoftEtherVPN[1]. It's a bit easier to configure and supports multiple protocols, including OpenVPN. [1] https://github.com/S
by unsignedint 12y ago
Another solution I'd recommend is SoftEtherVPN[1].
It's a bit easier to configure and supports multiple protocols, including OpenVPN.
[1] https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/ https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/
- ashmud 12y agoBack when I tried SoftEther several months back, by way of VPN Gate, the connections seemed pretty unreliable compared to OpenVPN. I think the VPN Gate software locked down the options in SoftEther, though. Packet loss affected gaming and video streaming in particular. Casual web browsing was OK.
- unsignedint 12y agoIf you are talking about VPNGate, the public VPN gateways, VPNGate can be a mixed bag. As far as I know, those connections are maintained by varying network environments; some are probably better than others. I use SoftEther server/client for LAN access for work and home, and it works decently well. (Only thing is things like compression and certificate based authentication only works over SoftEther client, although support for certificate auth for other protocols are on its roadmap.)