It's quite possible that the results are "organic" in the naive definition by following this process: 1. {site} starts at rank 1 due to low visitors/connectivi

It's quite possible that the results are "organic" in the naive definition by following this process: 1. {site} starts at rank 1 due to low visitors/connectivity 2. {site} pays for adwords driving new visitors 3. visitors link to the site 4. rank of the site increases allowing increase adwords spend 5. goto 2 The suggestion that Google artificially inflates the rank of big spenders is maybe conflating correlation and causation. On the other hand, it's not impossible or even that difficult to believe.