Ah of course, thanks! That makes sense. Since I'm on OSX and -static doesn't work with GCC (libs provided aren't static) - I'll believe it instead. Rustc is now

Ah of course, thanks! That makes sense. Since I'm on OSX and -static doesn't work with GCC (libs provided aren't static) - I'll believe it instead. Rustc is now 9K, which is really close to 8.7 of GCC.