> Shouldn't that be its users? No, an open source project with a minor foothold is wholly dependant on its developers/contributors. The users at this point hav

> Shouldn't that be its users? No, an open source project with a minor foothold is wholly dependant on its developers/contributors. The users at this point have very little investment. > because this is really 2K multiplied by all the times it gets used No matter how many times it gets used, it's still 0.56%. > Fun and games has its time and place, but the runtime library of a new language that's trying to increase its popularity is not it. Despite your baseless proposition, Rust has done very well in gaining popularity as a C++ competitor. It has done this by discerning in features that actually matter like safety, structure and consistency.