3 ms·
Microsoft or otherwise, I don't think the idea that GitHub is going to be run like a public utility forever is a smart bet.
by Joeboy 12y ago
Microsoft or otherwise, I don't think the idea that GitHub is going to be run like a public utility forever is a smart bet.
- davidgerard 12y agoIt's reasonably easy to pick up your repo and leave. How easy is it to pick up your bugs and leave?
- audreyt 12y agoReasonably easy: https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlab-recipes/blob/master/import/github/import_all.rb https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlab-recipes/blob/master/impor...
- sytse 12y agoGitLab B.V. CEO here, on the 22th of this month (January) we'll come out with GitLab 7.7 that includes a GitHub.com importer for both repo's and issues. It will have a simple web interface where you can select the projects to import.
- spork1 12y agoPretty easy; https://developer.github.com/v3/issues/#list-issues-for-a-repository https://developer.github.com/v3/issues/#list-issues-for-a-re...
- josteink 12y agoIt seems it's pretty easy with Github wikis too: http://stackoverflow.com/a/22002422 http://stackoverflow.com/a/22002422
- pistle 12y agoPrivate repos cost and there is, and will be, a sufficient demand for such a purpose. Between nuget for package mgmt and github (instead of TFS, etc) you are looking at having important, common pieces available. This makes it extremely comfortable to be in the MS dev camp and still feel that you can interface with others and be sharpening the sword in ways that enable you to build cross platform and potentially jump platforms as necessary. People have seen experienced .net devs picking up in a wide assortment of communities. Some interpret this as mind flight, or it might just be that the .net ecosystem has made some wise choices that enable devs raised in the ecosystem to not feel their world has silo walls. It's less "no, this" and more "yes, and."