In another thread I criticized Dr. Stallman's responses. I stand by the criticism. _However_, he hasn't actually decided yet, he's just pursuing the matter ou

In another thread I criticized Dr. Stallman's responses. I stand by the criticism. _However_, he hasn't actually decided yet, he's just pursuing the matter outside the mailing list. Could we let him either change his mind or reaffirm his initial conclusion as final before we heap extrapolations on to the pile? Should Emacs get complex refactoring and code completion? Yes. Should it get them by way of GCC? Ideally. Will it harm Emacs and GCC if this functionality remains crippled in both components of the tool chain? It seems likely. Has RMS decided to go this way? Not yet. BTW: The latest in the thread is a proposition which RMS actually asked for in his initial response: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-01/msg00223.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-01/msg00...