2 ms·
> not that everybody uses it because of that He says "succeeded", isn't that the same thing you are arguing against?
by zzzcpan 12y ago
> not that everybody uses it because of that
He says "succeeded", isn't that the same thing you are arguing against?
- krenoten 12y agoNot quite, I am against the notion that everybody uses Go for one reason. But I also think that the reason you gave would not be true if goroutines and channels, or some other easy to use concurrency abstraction, were not a primary fixture of the language.