3 ms·
There are assumptions in that theorem that do not apply to the situation as I am discussing it. I only brought it up there to point out why it doesn't necessari
by Retra 12y ago
There are assumptions in that theorem that do not apply to the situation as I am discussing it. I only brought it up there to point out why it doesn't necessarily work: there is no physical requirement for group morality to be comprehensible to an individual.
You can't define societal value in terms of pure state preferences. You _can_ define it in terms of general constraints on optimizations.
- yummyfajitas 12y agoThe easiest way to show you can define something is to write down the definition. It's odd that you are unwilling to define a term so central to your original thesis. (Also you clearly don't understand Arrow's theorem at all.)