4 ms·

For the other clueless readers: MAC: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_authentication_code http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_authentication_code [Please

• brownbat 12y ago
  To be fair, the first use was a link to the wikipedia article, the style just doesn't give you any indication of that. If I recall, underlining links led to heated debates in some circles, but it's really, really nice to have some visual signal to set off links for readers. If it wasn't obvious why already, this is a great case.
  • akjsdfh 12y ago
    > To be fair, the first use was a link to the wikipedia article, the style just doesn't give you any indication of that. Huh? it's a different color.
    • brownbat 12y ago
      Huh, yeah, they are two different shades of gray. Completely missed that, so I'm still for more contrast in links. I guess if I'm forced to rate Moxie Marlinspike on presentation, maybe he gets docked a point. It all feels a bit like rating chef Jonathan Benno on shoelace cleanliness though.
    • slang800 12y ago
      At first glance, I just thought the slightly different shade was for emphasis, rather than indicating a link.
  • jimmaswell 12y ago
    Who in their right mind would debate against underlined hyperlinks? Either underlined or blue, and bolded. Keep it at that accepted standard. Such senseless bikeshedding. If your design breaks user expectations then it's almost certainly bad design.