4 ms·
The author is overly self-congratulatory I think. An article three years ago (Even though the byline date is more recent. A database update that didn't preserve
by whoopdedo 12y ago
The author is overly self-congratulatory I think. An article three years ago (Even though the byline date is more recent. A database update that didn't preserve timestamps? Or sneaky SEO to make it appear more relevant?) says much the same thing with more details about how the testing is done. http://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/nascar/the-secrets-of-laurel-hill/ http://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/nascar/the-secre...
- mwg66 12y agoThe article was put online in 2014 but had previously appeared in print. Indeed, this article offers nothing new about the tunnel.
- forgottenpass 12y agoThe author is overly self-congratulatory I think Considering the breadcrumbs that the author admitted to finding online, I'm realizing that the state of investigative reporting is much worse off than I previously assumed.
- Gracana 12y agoThe author specifically mentions that article.