5 ms·
I wonder how this would compare to rsync using the '-z' (compress) option.
by huskyr 12y ago
I wonder how this would compare to rsync using the '-z' (compress) option.
- inyourtenement 12y agoSpeaking generally, rsync is faster than straight copying if the files partially exist in the destination first. If they don't exist, or they've changed completely, rsync is slower due to the checksumming on both sides.
- buster 12y agoThere is no checksumming if the file doesnt exist..