3 ms·

The quoting is quite misguiding, the article and its title say: > we have reason to believe that libsecp256k1 is better tested and more thoroughly reviewed tha

The quoting is quite misguiding, the article and its title say: > we have reason to believe that libsecp256k1 is better tested and more thoroughly reviewed than the implementation in OpenSSL which is something very different from generically being "better" (which has 0 information value, BTW).

nullc 12y ago
Thanks, yes. I spoke intentionally.
- bdr 12y ago
  Sorry. I knew I was mangling it, but it was the only way to get within HN's title restrictions. Thought about leaving a pre-emptive comment to that effect, and I probably should have.