4 ms·

- We are talking about HULHE only. If the game were no limit and 9 players the numbers presented in the article regarding possible states grow, by a lot. AFAIK

by ogig 12y ago

- We are talking about HULHE only. If the game were no limit and 9 players the numbers presented in the article regarding possible states grow, by a lot. AFAIK there is no bot that could break even against a table of decent players playing NL. "Crack Poker" seems an overstatement to me. - The articles states the bot always wins in the long run but most correctly this bot can break even at worst scenario. I mean, if you face it against itself they can't both win in the long run.

jonahx 12y ago
> AFAIK there is no bot that could break even against a table of decent players playing NL. While it's true that NL ring is far from being solved in the same mathematical sense the HULHE has been, there exist very good bots that can certainly beat a table of decent players, and perhaps even world-class players. There were a number of scandals with ring NL bots on UltimateBet and other online sites, with huge samples showing solid win rates at midstakes. There is also pokersnowie: http://www.pokersnowie.com/ http://www.pokersnowie.com/ and here is a huge thread about it from when it first arrived on the scene: http://www.deucescracked.com/forums/131-Poker-Theory/topics/602161-Time-to-learn-PLO-low-con?page=9&per_page=15#post_5292271 http://www.deucescracked.com/forums/131-Poker-Theory/topics/...