3 ms·
I'm not contradicting your observations. I'm pointing out a sociological fact. You do not know the definition of lower middle class. http://en.wikipedia.org/
by saschajustin 12y ago
I'm not contradicting your observations.
I'm pointing out a sociological fact.
You do not know the definition of lower middle class.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lower_middle_class http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lower_middle_class
http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Software_Engineer_%2F_Developer_%2F_Programmer/Salary http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Software_Engineer_%2...
The median income for a programmer is $69,708. This falls into the lower middle class.
When Silicon Valley salaries are adjusted to account for cost of living, programmers making over $100,000 still fall into the LOWER middle class.
People who get into software chasing money and elite status are ignorant of the fact that programmers are not elite and do not have high social status. They have lower middle class status and pay--which is better than working class at least.
- wpietri 12y agoYou're conflating household income and individual salary, and you're also using a technical definition in a a colloquial context. Entertaining for you, I'm sure, but again it doesn't make this look like a serious discussion.
- saschajustin 12y agoHousehold income is not the metric being used. It is income associated with a particular occupation that is used to class order those occupations. I guess you're right about failing to conform to colloquial myths and falsehoods. I tend to want to align my observations with facts and research rather than pop culture misunderstandings and ignorance.