Diebold was an actual knowing misrepresentation. (They also only paid 125k in damages) IE Diebold knew they were doing it. There is no real caselaw (that i'm a

Diebold was an actual knowing misrepresentation. (They also only paid 125k in damages) IE Diebold knew they were doing it. There is no real caselaw (that i'm aware of) around "not investigating" or "willful blindness".