3 ms·
HTTP/2 is not SPDY. They're not compatible. The IETF mailing list archives are open if you'd like to see what 3 years of standardsing looks like. You can als
by parasubvert 12y ago
HTTP/2 is not SPDY. They're not compatible.
The IETF mailing list archives are open if you'd like to see what 3 years of standardsing looks like. You can also go to the chair's blog (mnot.net) to read the evolution. Or Roy Fielding's presentations on Waka which were one of the early (2002) catalysts among the IETF-orbiters that lead to HTTP/2.
http://gbiv.com/protocols/waka/200211_fielding_apachecon.ppt http://gbiv.com/protocols/waka/200211_fielding_apachecon.ppt
Ultimately Waka was already a decade late, Google had SPDY which had some similarities and was already deployed, and people didn't want to wait another decade to build something no one might adopt. There were aspects of SPDY that needed changing to make it a true protocol standard rather than just a shared library, and a few features that out of rough consensus were changed.
That's how successful standards processes actually work - codifying what's already working, implemented in the field. Implementing a standard no one uses? See Atompub. See XHTML2.