3 ms·

Nobody has successfully gotten anyone fined/real damages for this provision yet. Partially because it requires knowing misrepresentation, not just negligent or

Nobody has successfully gotten anyone fined/real damages for this provision yet. Partially because it requires knowing misrepresentation, not just negligent or even grossly negligent misrepresentation.

MichaelGG 12y ago
What about the Diebold case?
- DannyBee 12y ago
  Diebold was an actual knowing misrepresentation. (They also only paid 125k in damages) IE Diebold knew they were doing it. There is no real caselaw (that i'm aware of) around "not investigating" or "willful blindness".