5 ms·
The problem is the license tries to say the same thing at least 3 times, and that results in tremendous ambiguity. If you wanted to use it commercially and saf
by hga 12y ago
The problem is the license tries to say the same thing at least 3 times, and that results in tremendous ambiguity.
If you wanted to use it commercially and safely, you'd have to spend quite a bit on an IP lawyer with no guarantee he'd give you an OK. In a universe with so many good languages, many with much bigger communities (in part because of the license), with well understood and often tested in court licences, it's a non-starter.
The intent is fine, everybody's code will run on your port, modulo bugs, and is plainly stated in the last line of the licence: “Thou shalt not break the spec” It's the execution by someone who's a computer scientist, not a lawyer, nor very familiar with IP law.