Much thanks, that really clarifies the situation, but it also inspires further questions. So people purchasing shares were theoretically providing the investme

Much thanks, that really clarifies the situation, but it also inspires further questions. So people purchasing shares were theoretically providing the investment funds to complete the toll road, and as a result of that risk, would have access to the profits of the toll road in proportion to their investment, correct? So BrisConnections doesn't want to see the fund dissolved because it loses all the capital represented by the $.001 investors by virtue of still owing $2, and Thiess John Holland wanted to maintain the entity that owed them a contract for building part of the road?