3 ms·
For the time being. It is a concern for the future. For example, here is a tiny super cheap, lens-free camera: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/525731/lens-
by Houshalter 12y ago
For the time being. It is a concern for the future. For example, here is a tiny super cheap, lens-free camera: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/525731/lens-free-camera-sees-things-differently/ http://www.technologyreview.com/news/525731/lens-free-camera...
And there is "super-resolution" which combines multiple low-res pictures (e.g. frames of a video) into a single high resolution image: http://vimeo.com/6608238 http://vimeo.com/6608238
- ctdonath 12y agotiny super cheap, lens-free camera Cover a wall with those. Full 3D capture. Intersperse those on that wall with tiny pods of directional LEDs. Think "lenticular 3D" but with hemispheres instead of half-cylinders. Remotely connect two of these walls. Result is a virtual 2-way window, with full natural 3D viewing without headgear. Could revolutionize teleconferencing: participant(s) are "just" on the other side of a glass wall...with the "other side" any distance away. Bandwidth required may be staggering relative to current video, yet is currently manageable.