4 ms·
I wonder if it's related to this workaround that allowed access to some Google IPs to bypass the captive portal, which someone managed to then use to access app
by Kliment 12y ago
I wonder if it's related to this workaround that allowed access to some Google IPs to bypass the captive portal, which someone managed to then use to access app engine, and a proxy running there to reach the entire internet: http://bryceboe.com/2012/03/12/bypassing-gogos-inflight-internet-authentication/ http://bryceboe.com/2012/03/12/bypassing-gogos-inflight-inte...
quote from that article:
"There is, of course, one other possible solution: Gogo could man-in-the-middle the desired Google web services in order to perform filtering on the HTTP host header. However, this approach could have unforeseen consequences. Therefore, I do not recommend it."
- HackinOut 12y agoWell they would be facing the unforeseen consequences while not even filtering the HTTP host header (the youtube page is displayed). Unless they forgot to disable the MITM once the user is granted full internet access... EDIT: Those are two nice insights about what Gogo does behind the scene, but I would bet the fact Google is involved with both is a coincidence (or is it considering the multiplicity of Google's Services?)
- chasefox 12y agocaptive portal != proxy