3 ms·
It's worth pointing out that the author of this piece is considered by many to be patent troll. https://gigaom.com/2011/04/13/419-jay-walker-goes-nuclear-price
by jonas21 12y ago
It's worth pointing out that the author of this piece is considered by many to be patent troll.
https://gigaom.com/2011/04/13/419-jay-walker-goes-nuclear-priceline-founder-sues-more-than-100-companies/ https://gigaom.com/2011/04/13/419-jay-walker-goes-nuclear-pr...
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/04/priceline-founder-sues-100-companies-including-google-apple-over-patents/ http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/04/priceline-founder...
- mawburn 12y agoOddly enough, I think that gives him more credibility in my book. Who better to talk about a system being broken than someone who makes a living exploiting it?
- jonas21 12y agoAnother way of looking at this is that his trolling has not been going so well lately [1], so he's trying a change in tactics. The "brokenness" that he sees in the patent system is not that it's too easy to profit from patenting obvious things, but rather that it's too hard. [1] http://www.law360.com/articles/573649/google-wins-invalidation-of-walker-digital-patent-claims http://www.law360.com/articles/573649/google-wins-invalidati...
- logn 12y agoI thought that too when I read the end of his article. And he states that only small/mid-size companies worry about infringement so his company is targeting them. In my direct experience at a 50,000 person company, large companies worry too. Our Internet proxy banned no sites except patent databases. Additionally, filing for patents is the other good way to reduce risk. I wonder, does professional liability insurance cover patent infringement?