2 ms·
The scientific evidence [0] compares to "worst" for 10X, not "average". [0] http://www.construx.com/10x_Software_Development/Origins_of_10X_%E2%80%93_How_Valid
by qznc 12y ago
The scientific evidence [0] compares to "worst" for 10X, not "average".
[0] http://www.construx.com/10x_Software_Development/Origins_of_10X_%E2%80%93_How_Valid_is_the_Underlying_Research_/ http://www.construx.com/10x_Software_Development/Origins_of_...
- devanti 12y agoIn that case, there are "InfiniteX" programmers. The worst programmers will get stuck on complex problems and may never complete the task without help. It all depends on the task. And I say "average" programmer because average is fairly bad if you look at the workforce on a global scale.
- LaSEctOc 12y agoIn my experience, the worst programmers have negative productivity. 10X programmers must be real monsters.
- CmonDev 12y agoBecause they have negative productivity multiplied by 10?