3 ms·
That's interesting about the power levels per-channel. In my case, I actually WANT the not-going-through-walls experience. In an apartment (or hotel room), the
by skuhn 12y ago
That's interesting about the power levels per-channel. In my case, I actually WANT the not-going-through-walls experience. In an apartment (or hotel room), the goal is just to get as much coverage as you need, not to blanket three floors down.
Smarter power level selection on APs (specifically consumer grade) would be nice. If all of your clients have acceptable signal strength, ratchet down, otherwise try ratching up, etc. If nothing else, it would be nice if manual control was possible (e.g. Apple removed transmit power selector from AirPort Utility).
There's also the problem I mentioned with OS X (and possibly other clients) being biased towards 2.4GHz. I have to create separate SSIDs for 2.4 and 5 GHz at home, and some devices live on one and some on the other. Otherwise, I'll see occasional periods of really terrible performance with 2.4GHz, presumably because of interference (I can see 20+ SSIDs from my living room).
- jrockway 12y agoYes, clients are very bad about choosing the best connection for themselves. Access points can work around this by delaying probe responses on 2.4GHz relative to 5GHz, or by doing full-on band-steering (though it has to know that the target device is 5GHz-capable, which is hard). Really, WiFi is a mess, and it's up to the access point to restore sanity if possible. You're sort of doing that by hiding 2.4GHz under another SSID. (I do the same thing at home. I have a couple of devices that are 2.4GHz only. I can't wait until I can finally turn that off.)