7 ms·
My experience with this kind of transfer system is limited to the posted article, but the benefits sound enormous! > 1) They take time to process, so if you ha
by generalk 17y ago
My experience with this kind of transfer system is limited to the posted article, but the benefits sound enormous!
> 1) They take time to process, so if you have to move money around, you can give someone a check and then go put the money in that account.
With the giro transfer method, it sounds like you're in more control -- it's a push, not a pull.
> 2) You control when the vendor gets paid. If you give someone a credit card number, they can just charge you. With a check, they have to ask ME for money, and I decide when or if I'm going to pay.
Right, but after you give them the check, it becomes exactly like a credit card. They can charge you at-will. And, just like your credit card, there are stiff penalties for fraud. And just like your credit card, fraud still happens.
> 3) Signed, written, record.
How is physically stepping into your bank and personally authorizing a transfer of funds any less of a signed record than a check?
> 4) NO FEES attached for the vendor. I LOVE getting paid by check because I don't have to give 5-10% away to some bank.
Why do you assume that there's a vendor fee here?
Personally, if I never saw another paper check that'd be fine. They're nothing but a hassle. Having a quick and easy ability to accept deposits and authorize transfers without the use of a paper check is such an amazing convenience that I'm shocked we haven't adopted such a system.