3 ms·
I'm not sure if this is exactly where al2o3cr was going, but a Ruby (or whatever) application would normally include such things as caching and queueing. Despi
by zentrus 12y ago
I'm not sure if this is exactly where al2o3cr was going, but a Ruby (or whatever) application would normally include such things as caching and queueing. Despite the slowness of Ruby et al, I actually would expect a modern application with these layers to handle load much better than straight database calls. So I guess I would consider the PostgREST implementation a bottleneck because you can't add any of these layers.
- icebraining 12y agoWhy couldn't you add a plain HTTP caching layer (e.g. Varnish) on top of PostgREST?
- zentrus 12y agoYes, you could. My only point is that PostgREST limits you in what you can do in terms of handling load.