I see requiring visas for employees in the first place as the "exemption from supply and demand (of labor)". National boundaries, timezones, cultures, local go

I see requiring visas for employees in the first place as the "exemption from supply and demand (of labor)". National boundaries, timezones, cultures, local governance issues, political issues, etc... still exist. The globalist view is ignores this and assumes that visas are an artificial barrier to entry. If the argument is to promote US interests, (as his is, and PG's possibly is) one can't view it through globalist glasses but nationalist glasses. Large corporations seek to increase their ability to get labor in whichever country their operations reside. This increases the supply of labor in that country, which drives downward pressure on wages.