4 ms·
I think it is unfortunate this does not support python 3. I think we have already passed a tipping point in the migration from python 2. Just look at the python
by thomasmarcelis 12y ago
I think it is unfortunate this does not support python 3. I think we have already passed a tipping point in the migration from python 2. Just look at the python 3 readiness[0]. I believe it might already be more interesting for beginners to learn python 3 over python 2 now.
All new packages should think about supporting python3, or at least be ready to support it with a lot of __future__ imports.
[0]: http://py3readiness.org/ http://py3readiness.org/
- alixander 12y agoI'm not exactly sure if it doesn't work on Python3, I had only tested it on 2.7 so it mightt (there aren't any external dependencies). I'll probably test it on Python3 and safely include that in the supported versions soon.
- tschuy 12y agoIt wasn't too bad, looks like you had a couple of calls to xrange() (now just range()) and were using the result of a filter as a list. I've submitted a PR to add 3.4 support to it, and to add it to Travis.