3 ms·
I'm part of the crowd who thinks it's too bad that D didn't get that far, that it was encumbered by licence issues and a syntax sometimes more complete than wha
by nddrylliog 17y ago
I'm part of the crowd who thinks it's too bad that D didn't get that far, that it was encumbered by licence issues and a syntax sometimes more complete than what you need.
I'm trying to stay minimal with ooc's syntax. From 0.3 on, it's heavily Io-inspired (Steve Dekorte and I are regularly discussing syntax matters.) and with operator overloading, generics, etc. you get a very expressive language at little cost.
In the end, it's just a bunch of new idioms to learn =)
- steveklabnik 17y agoD still has a few tricks up its sleeves, don't worry ;). But nice language. It's pretty!