5 ms·
I for one support sanctions on NK for voicing threats against Sony. It's immaterial whether they did it or not. I'm just sick and tired of NK's tantrums and ho
by dba7dba 12y ago
I for one support sanctions on NK for voicing threats against Sony.
It's immaterial whether they did it or not. I'm just sick and tired of NK's tantrums and hopefully this will keep the propaganda arm of NK govt keep its mouth shut for a little while.
- aikah 12y agoWhere is the proof NK did it ? did the FBI at least made a case against NK? or just because the president says NK did it,it's true? well maybe it's good enough for most people but that's the problem,it shouldn't be.
- dba7dba 12y agoNot hard to find proof NK was threatening American company and citizens. http://variety.com/2014/film/news/sony-hackers-threaten-911-attack-on-movie-theaters-that-screen-the-interview-1201380712/ http://variety.com/2014/film/news/sony-hackers-threaten-911-...
- aikah 12y agoAre you kidding me? that's what you call concrete evidence? aside from the FBI and the media repeating what the government says there is no evidence. So please don't pretend this Echo chamber does prove something.It doesn't.There is absolutely no evidence NK did it. At least during the WMDs madness,the Bush government tried to make a case.Now they don't even bother.Why would they? with people like you,they just have to point fingers at a country and say "let's go get them".
- dba7dba 12y agoMy God, my point was whether NK hacked or not. My point is NK is famous for threatening other nations. If any nation that doesn't deserve any benefit of doubt is NK. Kim doesn't deserve the title of 'head of a nation state'. I'm sure you are a good liberty minded person and if so, you shouldn't waste any energy defending little Kim.