3 ms·
That's fine, but it's exactly the opposite of the attitude expressed in the post. "The ratio of bytes loaded to load time should be very close to the I/O throu
by jwmerrill 12y ago
That's fine, but it's exactly the opposite of the attitude expressed in the post.
"The ratio of bytes loaded to load time should be very close to the I/O throughput of the machine."
How do you think the bytes served for a few hundred requests a minute compares to the theoretical I/O throughput of the relevant machines?
And because no one can see my tongue in my cheek across the internet, I'll be explicit that I'm sure he is a user of his publishing environment, not it's author, and so it's fair to view this as just another symptom of the problem he's discussing.