3 ms·
Yeah I was really just trying to point out that the marketing on the main page can be improved. I get that OOP can be a selling feature, but the other four not
by icefox 12y ago
Yeah I was really just trying to point out that the marketing on the main page can be improved. I get that OOP can be a selling feature, but the other four not so much. Using the main page to talk about how great it does integration, how great the docs and examples are, and the API compatibility story are all things that would be better for convincing users to go to the next page. Using the funnel model how many users only viewed the main page and never went further?
- munificent 12y ago> Yeah I was really just trying to point out that the marketing on the main page can be improved. I get that OOP can be a selling feature, but the other four not so much. It's a totally fair point. One thing I'm trying to keep in mind is who I'm marketing to. Right now, since Wren is so young, the people whose attention I want are not end users. They'd have to be half crazy to use Wren in its current state in a real application. The people that will take an interest now are those that are keen on new languages for their own novelty's sake, or that are interesting in contributing to Wren itself. That's the audience I had in mind, and I think the bullet points make a bit more sense when you consider that. Definitely, when Wren gets more mature, it makes sense to refocus the initial verbiage on what it can do for and end user.