Obviously famo.us is more famous than snabbt.js. But seriously, they both do the same thing. Instead of using css transitions they both use request animation fr

Obviously famo.us is more famous than snabbt.js. But seriously, they both do the same thing. Instead of using css transitions they both use request animation frames and then only do the transformations that are fast to do. The main differences is the size of Snabbt, which only does animation, and Famo.us which handles touch events has a larger physics engine and more utility functions. There are efforts being done to implement parts of Material design using famo.us: Demo http://skelware.com/famous-material/demo/1/ http://skelware.com/famous-material/demo/1/ Source https://github.com/StephanBijzitter/Famous-Material-Examples https://github.com/StephanBijzitter/Famous-Material-Examples