You didn't really read it carefully then. It's criticizing the question. You can't "criticize people who explain monads badly" without explaining monads well.

You didn't really read it carefully then. It's criticizing the question. You can't "criticize people who explain monads badly" without explaining monads well. Think about it. This is like me criticizing how classes are taught, without offering my version or showing how they should be taught. Come on. I'm afraid this post is completely without any value. It's an outline for the post that the author should write, when the author figures out how to teach monads (which don't exist in all languages) properly. Building up from several usage cases, per the author's outline. The only problem with the outline is that it's notes to self on how to teach monads well. Well, go ahead then. Put your money where your mouth is and teach people who have never used a monad how to use a monad. Which is why they're asking.