3 ms·
That's a question I've been asking myself a lot while I talk with my family. I think there are two possible reasons : 1. There is big conspiracy between organ
by drinchev 12y ago
That's a question I've been asking myself a lot while I talk with my family.
I think there are two possible reasons :
1. There is big conspiracy between organized crime and governments on a worldwide level, which conclude in mutual help ( government <-> organized crime )
2. The rate of bribes and illegal business deals are overrated by media and actually there isn't such a thing as "massive corruption practices".
Those both reasons are part of what I figured out as the "conspiracy paradox", which ( ironically ) is again based on two statements :
1. There isn't any large conspiracy theory existing, because there is a statistically significant change of a whistleblower to come out and speak about that.
2. Statement 1 is equally true ( Edward Snowden ) and false ( Other unrevealed whistleblowers ).
- tgbrfv 12y agoYou should really research & pick your "world axioms" wisely, if done so you wouldn't see paradoxes where there are none. There is currently no way for a whistleblower to publish any information that powers on different levels don't want him to publish. That naive "hollywoody" view that you just send some information to all major news outlets/police/your representative(s) and things somehow change for the best .. how many dead whistleblowers because of this 24/7 reinforced naive world view will it take, so much fakery and people are still in the dark(would expect more from this community - although I understand the temptation to fall for every false hero/honeypot organistation our powers throw at you in this medieval society)