Read the Kapersky analysis, it starts to answer your questions regarding the reuse of Shamoon by NK. Doesn't matter though, my point was, this was not the medi

Read the Kapersky analysis, it starts to answer your questions regarding the reuse of Shamoon by NK. Doesn't matter though, my point was, this was not the media regurgitating a US gov opinion as the comment I replied to claimed. I agree that the publically available evidence is never 100%, but the malware samples and c&c infrastructure point to NK. If you have evidence that someone else did it, that would be interesting. As it stands, NK has a very strong motive for the timing of this move, so that plus just the public info, and the FBI claim based on nonpublic info is enough to convince me they are responsible. However, the spectrum of "responsibility" is quite broad: http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2014/12/what-does-responsibility-mean-for.html?m=1 http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2014/12/what-does-responsibi...