3 ms·

So not kgraft, kpatch, etc. http://www.infoworld.com/article/2851028/linux/four-ways-linux-is-headed-for-no-downtime-kernel-patching.html http://www.infoworld.

So not kgraft, kpatch, etc. http://www.infoworld.com/article/2851028/linux/four-ways-linux-is-headed-for-no-downtime-kernel-patching.html http://www.infoworld.com/article/2851028/linux/four-ways-lin... Looks DKMS for the kernel itself.

Somasis 12y ago
Basically, yeah. I have no need for patching without downtime (not really in the scope of lux anyway), I just don't like how the upgrade method tends to be either keeping track of development through patches or starting over from a clean config or other methods. I greatly enjoy the automated approach binary distributions have.
- fubarred 12y ago
  I guess if you really, really had a use case for it, binary patching using one of the open-source solutions might be feasible. Otherwise, HA load-balancing FTW.