3 ms·
Definitely more than 'arguably' more useful. The intervalometer alone fills in for a $129 piece of hardware [0] and the HDR recording, although far from the sta
by Veratyr 12y ago
Definitely more than 'arguably' more useful. The intervalometer alone fills in for a $129 piece of hardware [0] and the HDR recording, although far from the standard of a Blackmagic camera, allows a $500 consumer SLR to produce HDR video where a $2000 camera would normally be required.
And those are just the features I could easily equate to money. There's also the zebra striping and so many other features I can't think of right now.
Magic Lantern is beautiful.
[0] http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/164271-REG/Canon_2477A002_Timer_Remote_Controller_TC_80N3.html http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/164271-REG/Canon_2477A...
- dingaling 12y agoInterestingly the developers of Magic Lantern have explicitly stated that they will never develop it for the pro 1D and C ranges of cameras. Apparently this is a result of some informal or undisclosed agreement with Canon, as the pro cameras are where Canon's recurring revenue lies.
- post_break 12y agoIt's probably a threat. Enable ML for the pro series cameras, and we encrypt boot loaders etc. Or even sue. But don't touch them and we'll have a gentlemen's agreement.